Suggestions like 'ignoring the manual and following chucks guides instead'.just makes me SMH. not that there aren't good written/video guides.
#Dcs world mission editor manual how to
I guarantee a player who starts at Chapter 1 of the official documentation and works their way through it will not only learn the plane and how to use it, they'll learn it better than a large chunk of the DCS community that relies strictly on quick guides (youtube or otherwise). Like you, I am sure you have a very well stocked aircraft hangar, with some serious hardware to fly. but following the manual led to less problems later down the road. Review: DCS World v1.2.5 Thrustmaster Warthog A-10-C Joystick By Nigel Martin I have to admit, there is nothing I like more to set the FMC, in my trusty 737-800 and fly off to some exotic clime, OK albeit a virtual one. In the case of the Mirage I actually found a few things that are quite different between Chuck's and the official manual. However, they have limitations and they're not a replacement for the official documentation. That's really what they are and what they were designed for (to get you up in the air quickly), and they're great when dealing with your first module especially because they're a lot less intimidating than the manual. I don't want to give the wrong impression, I have no issue with Chuck's Guides being used as familiarization guides. I´ll tell you more: for me, the SU-25T manual is less confusing than the M-2000C´s.īut you know. Related to the M-2000C I find Chuck´s guide much more valuable, than the manual, which looks to me somewhat confusing in the order of the contents. Besides FC3 I have only the Mirage 2000C, in which I have been investing my DCSW time in the last weeks and learning slowly but secure, how to fly it and manage the cockpit. I would like however, to add along with the manual, the DCSW YouTubers tutorials and missions videos. Chuck's guides are good alongside the manual (as a way to sometimes clarify via visuals) but saying that one should ONLY use Chuck's guides and not the manual really doesn't make a whole lot of sense and really only discourages players from using genuinely good sources of info. I consider the manual (especially in the case of the Viggen) the best, most complete source for information. What? Chuck´s, manual, or both? Which is your good information source?
0 kommentar(er)
